Tales of love, friendship, and everything in between.

At first, my blog was basically complaints, but then I realized nobody wants to sit there and read about my whining. Plus, I'm really not THAT negative a person. Enjoy.

Sunday, January 29, 2006

MLK's wise words

"In the end, we remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."

I think that says enough. Have a nice day.

-Ayah

P.S. I'm working on finding a pseudonym or alias to use professionally (like Ayah "_____" Helmy, because I've come to realize Ayah is just too hard a name to be used internationally. I need a more memorable name. People are always like "what's you name? Alia?" It's pretty annoying. If anyone has suggestions, let me know. You probably won't get a prize for the best, but I'll give you a big round of applause. I had a dream yesterday that everyone was calling me Yaya. I'm not sure how I feel about it, though.

Saturday, January 28, 2006

A Historian Makes No Mistakes

Truly, if we understand our past, we can improve our future. I was browsing the online news resources (while trying to filter through the bias) and I realized that upon understanding our past, we will be able to alleviate the sorrows of the future of the world. Less mistakes will be made and more people will be able to understand how the world works, thusly making their lives and their interaction with others more harmonious.

I've taken a liking to reading about Egyptian history, because I realized last semester that I know 100 times more about American history than about the history of my roots. I took a seminar about Islam and Christianity through the ages and when my professor talked about Egypt, he would ask me what I knew about a certain political figure or time period and I found that I knew absolutely nothing about my own country (and also I found out how it feels to be humiliated time after time after time). So, while my mother was in Egypt last month, I asked her to bring me an abreviated version of Egypt's modern history. It made sense to me that even if the book is in English, coming out of Egypt, it won't be as skewed as it would be here.

So I was thinking today after having a conversation with a friend yesterday (Hi Stephanie!) after going out for some fabulous Thai food from Sawatdee in Uptown, that even if someone doesn't have the full history and background about something, they will still make judgements on them (as was the case with one of her classmates). So it led me to think about Israel and Palestine and the people I've met this semester who actually know about, more than the media tells them, more than what the government wants them to know about it. I've found that the only people who believe in Palestine's cause are the people who know the brutality that her people have face over the past 7 decades, and there aren't many of them. So, I'd like to say "kudos" to those people and I think they know who they are.

So, in the masses understanding the truth about Palestine from when it started, could hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved? Could peace and unity be spread throughout the Middle East, fulfilling Gamal AbdElNasser's dream of a united Arab state? If so, who would be the world power today --America, still? It's a little bold to say that the Arab world would be on top had Nasser's dream been fulfilled; but I know that the world would be a completely different place right now. If ignorance was erased and replaced with acceptance and appreciation for one another's differences and past mistakes, so many things would have been different throughout history, like slavery or the World Wars. Knowledge is such a powerful thing and if we all knew and understood the things happening in our world and the things that have happened before us, we can mold a future that isn't as depressing as, for instance, Malthus' musings about the destruction of human kind, but a one-nation world of togetherness, tranquility, and understanding.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Am I really that bad?

Greed:Medium
 
Gluttony:High
 
Wrath:Medium
 
Sloth:Low
 
Envy:Medium
 
Lust:Very Low
 
Pride:High
 

Take the Seven Deadly Sins Quiz

I was browsing my buddy Ahmed Habashy's blog (http://ahmedhabashy.blogspot.com/) and I found this Seven Deadly Sins test. I think it's complete crap, cuz seriously, anyone who knows me knows I'm lazy as hell and it has the Sloth factor at LOW! LOW! That alone will throw you off, then top it off with the who high Pride category, and that'll mess you up for sure. I hate myself, so how am I proud? Yeah sure, I like some things about me, but in general, I would say that the pride factor is much less than that. Stupid web quiz making me doubt myself. Okay, I guess it's right in gluttony, and wrath seems about right, but I don't think I'm greedy, am I? Usually I tend to spend more than I have or spend more on others than on myself. How's that greedy? It's not like I'm sitting there counting my pennies every two seconds. I'd say that my biggest fault involving money is not appreciating its value as much as I should. Maybe they think I'm greedy because I don't like doing charity work? Hm... Huh? Oh, sorry, people, but I'm a student, not a saint! (For those of you who can't quite remember, that was a reference from the Count of Monte Cristo movie) And plus, I give my share of Zakaat (the charity Muslims who are able should give). Anyway, go see what they think your sins are, but don't take it too seriously.

Monday, January 23, 2006

Wilson

Sometimes I feel like I'd be better off with Wilson as my only friend. Don't remember who Wilson is? W Izzle? Here's a pic:




For my Hollywood-impaired friends, that's the volleyball Tom Hanks befriends in the movie Castaway.
So who cares about good old Wilson? Well, I was thinking the other day, wouldn't it just be easier to be friends with Wilson? I mean, one, he'll never give up your secrets; two, he'll never be late for hanging out with you; three, you'll be his only friend; four, you'll know you can trust him because his mouth is a line; and four, he'll live as long as you do.
It seems a little extreme, no? Well, I gotta say, I'm sick of dealing with people in general. It seems every time I interact with someone other than my closest friends, I get in trouble. Arabs are so dramatic. It's like are you fricken serious? I am incredulous sometimes at the situations that present themselves with people. It's intense, man. Even if you try helping someone, in the end, you get screwed for even trying to help, or else it all backfires and you end up looking like the bitch when everyone else is buddy-buddy and their issues are resolved.
Fricken a. I have class in 20 minutes and the chick I'm working with isn't back from her lunch break yet.

Let's see... anything else? OOOH!! I dropped one of my pointless-but-I-just-took-it-for-the-easy-A classes because it turned out to be WAY too much trouble than it's worth. So now on Mondays and Wednesdays, I can sleep in till 12. Yay!

"It's not a tumah!" ... I just love that line.

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Does wealth equal class?

Well, today is the second day of classes... and my second day on the job at the computer lab. I picked up a shift that a friend needed off and I really should be studying, but, big surprise, I'm not. Anyway, I was hanging out in the cafeteria getting a bite before I had to work at 6.

At the next table was this girl and her friend. The two were pretty decent-looking girls, sophomores, probably, one was a blonde, and one was a brunette with highlights. The brunette seemed pretty cute at first glance, but as Raymond Chandler has written, “from 30 feet away she looked like a lot of class. From 10 feet away she looked like something made up to be seen from 30 feet away.” Her makeup was pretty adolescent. You know when you're in 6th grade and all you want to do is wear blue eyeshadow and eyeliner and pink lipgloss with sparkles and shimmer? That's what she was wearing. It was so over-the-top and a sad attempt at looking elegant. You could tell that this girl was trying to fit in with her friend. She was wearing a pretty decent outfit --black pants and shirt with a pink shrug and black heels. However, it was so tight on her that it gave her that perfect Jersey girl image. She looked less sophisticated than the blonde, even though the blonde was wearing sweats and a sweatshirt (And for those of you who know me, you know I am biased for brunettes in general). You could also tell by the way the brunette was holding her tableware that she was less sophisticated than her friend. She held her fork the way a Viking would hold his turkey leg, and she was swigging from her bottle of water like an Irish sailor while her friend was taking small, polite sips. Finally, Brunette's posture and attitude was a little resentful when her friend would look away or when Blonde Girl went to get a fork for herself.

Now, I don't know if it'll come as a surprise to any of you, but I noticed Blondie's purse and shoes when they rose to walk away. She was wearing Uggs (fairly expensive, about $135 for the pair she was wearing) and was carrying a shearling Coach purse (worth probably about 200-240 dollars). I thought to myself "No wonder!" as I looked at Brunette's Jersey girl outfit --but I stopped myself. I know that money doesn't immediately constitute class and lack of money doesn't always constitute vulgarity.

Let's take some examples: I know these two chicks. One is wealthy (let's call her A) and one isn't (let's call her Z). A is always flaunting her cash and acting like she buys things for preposterous amounts of money (even though she doesn't). A isn't unclassy (is that a word?) because of the way she acts about money, but the way she acts in general. Class is more than being a certain stereotype. Class is grace under pressure. It's control in chaos. It's saying "No" when someone wants to do something underhanded. It's knowing how to act in every situation in which you are placed.

Z is always treating those around her as if she had money, and is generous and never flaunting of the expensive things she may buy once in a while. Z is actually more classy in general. The way she speaks, walks, carries herself, it all exudes refinement, even though she may not have the access to fine things like A does.

So where does our stereotype about class come from? According to Doug Robarchek, “money is related to class only in the minds of people who have too much of the former, too little of the latter or none of either.” I guess I can agree with him. Because if Ann Landers is correct ("Class is the sure-footedness that comes with having proved you can meet life"), and so is Harvey Mackay (“When a person with money meets a person with experience, the person with the experience winds up with the money and the person with the money winds up with the experience”), then I would rather be poor and classy than rich and swindled.

Monday, January 16, 2006

The Bitch Flu

I'm sorry... was there an illness going around I wasn't aware of? Syptoms are out-of-character bitchiness, an upturned nose, rudeness, melodrama, and a thirst to avoid your once-friends. I must'nt have gotten the public service announcement about everyone becoming liars and horrid friends. Maybe I was out of town.

Maybe it's just me, but lately, it seems like a lot of people have been acting a bit bitchy. Maybe it's just the people I roll with. Should I ride it out or what? It just seems like most of the people I know are PMSing right now... guys too, apparently.

On the other hand, there are people who have the right to be bitches, and are having a tough time or something. It seems to me that the people who have reasons are the ones who don't act as bitchy, as opposed to the bitches who act afool for no reason.

I dunno, maybe I'm the bitch and I'm projecting it on other people, but for God's sake, people, if this is how you're acting on vacation, how are you gonna be once finals come around again?

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Previous Post

Hey, guys! For those of you who read Maggie's blog, I apologize for the redundancy of mine. I just read her last post and it's pretty much the same subject of the post I last submitted. Oops... I guess great minds think alike. So... you can read both of ours and get a full scope of men's creds.

Ayah

Society's Credentials: Female Edition

From talks I've had with different Arab guys I'm friends with (the ones with the most influence on this post are Tarrek H. and O-Thabs), their idea of the perfect wife is pretty different than what the West projects as the ideal woman. For most girls who live here, it's pretty difficult to receive this message 24/7 of a powerful, independent woman from the West and then go home and get blaring message of the way a woman is supposed to be in the near East.

1. Woman must be, first and foremost, a wife: The first credential for an Arab wife is that she needs to be a wife. Sounds pretty stupid, because once a girl is married, she's a wife; but I mean that a girl needs to embody Arab society's roles for the "wife" before taking on her role as a lawyer or doctor or desk clerk or whatever. If the man is making enough money, the wife is expected to stay home (remember, guys, if you're makin enough for your wife to stay home, you better be making enough to keep that maid service. Just cuz she's staying home doesn't mean she's gonna scrub floors). Now, although I am the first girl to say that I want to do something worthwhile with my life (besides raising great kids), I probably wouldn't mind be a stay-at-home wife. I mean, what's there to complain about? Do charity work, join a book club, get a bikini wax, whatever. There a million things to do besides work. I'd probably rather do that than work, as bad as that sounds in this Western society.

2. Woman must have mothering qualities: Sorry, gentlemen, but I have to say it: all men like being babied. Personally, if I love someone, I naturally take on a nuturing/protective role, so I guess "mothering" comes naturally to most women (most being the operative word). I think that men need to look past the exterior of women they see who seem fit to be mothers. In most situations, these females can be mothers, but there are people with problems for a reason. I believe that all psychological problems root from the way a child was parented, so I think that there needs to be a major look at the way girls are to evaluate their merit as a future mother.

3. Woman must be college-educated: Not for her own good, but for the good of the children. There is no way to raise kids well if you don't posess a certain amount of academic curiosity and quench for knowledge --at least enough to get you through colllege. It was fine for mothers 50 years to be less than college educated, but our mothers and we need to be college educated, because studies show that within a certain time in a child's life, the mother and father are the main sources of knowledge. Also, there is a certain amount of keenness that comes with raising good children, that someone who has merely a high school degree cannot achieve.

4. I'm just gonna say it...the chick's gotta be hot: This is pretty self-explanatory, butto further elaborate, I can refer back to my post "Frenemies" and say that there is a certain amount of competition between people, especially men; thus, having a beautiful wife is another way to triumph for men, even if they won't really say so. It's really the same thing for women, but women get over it more easily than men and realize that not everyone looks like George Clooney.

For Westerners reading this blog, it may seem a bit too old-fashioned and, for lack of a better word, unequal. But since the girl has a list of priorities for men, then men naturally have a list of priorities for women. These priorities are set to result in the most correct and functional marriage possible for both the married and the children, who, if raised correctly, will have none other than these credentials for their mates.

Saturday, January 07, 2006

Society's Six Credentials

Inspired by a friend's blog (on the right, Maggie's Blog), I've decided to address the marriage issue in the form of a list. The reason for which it is so difficult to get married for Arab girls in our standing (living and probably born in America; in college or in the working world after college; and significantly more strong-minded than the average FOB (Fresh Off the Boat) girl.
I doubt it's the lack of men out there that is contributing to the problem, but it's the lack of eligible men. So what constitutes as eligible? Unfortunately, for girls like Maggie and I, the window of eligibility is pretty narrow. Here are some creds for a guy it would be "acceptable" for us to marry:

1. Man must be college educated, if not with higher educational standing (Masters, PhD): The reason for this very important requirement is that a girl will need to marry her educational equal or superior, naturally, for a stable household (both economically and emotionally --there is no way a man will stand for his wife making more money than he does and sustaining the household. If this occurs, the household is in major turbulence). Studies have shown that men with college educations make more than men who are purely high school educated and, more impotantly, more than women who are college educated. Thus, if the girl were to finish solely college, which is pretty much expected, her husband needs to finish college at least, if not more. If the girl decides to go on after college to attain her Master's or her PhD, that will close her window of marriage opportunity even more, unfortunately.

2. Man must be from a family that is of the same or high socio-economic standing: This seems a bit self-explanatory, but it is important to understand that in an Arab society, which allows for much less vertical social mobility, this is even more important. Interestingly enough, and also pretty annoying for many of the girls is that it is okay for a man to marry into a lower social caste, leaving the girls in his social level less prone to marriage, for their prospects are diminished.

3. Man must have a promising future: This seems as kind of a pick-and-choose, or optional, credential for a marriage prospect, especially with the aforementioned things, wouldn't that be already established? There is more to that comment, though. To have a promising future, a man needs to have ambition and some sort of plan. Not willy-nilly-I'm-not-sure-what-I'm-doing-after-I-get-out-of-school outlook. No father would allow his daughter to marry someone without a plan or ambition. For those of you who have seen "Big Daddy" with Adam Sandler, he would never successfully marry an Arab girl (even if he wasn't Jewish and American...).
Along with having a promising future, the man must have a stable career and income. The prospect of a promising future isn't enough, but there must be empirical proof for it, perse.

4. Man must be of the same religion of intended wife: In Arab culture, whatever religion you are, Muslim or Christian, people are usually pretty traditional in the way they deal with things in their religion. Even if one is not quite that religious day-to-day, once marriage is mentioned, the ceremony must be in the tradition of the religion with which one is affiliated.
...Usually parents would never accept someone who converts just to marry their daughter. Truthfully, I think that's correct. I wouldn't want someone to just go into my religion just to marry me. I think I'd need someone who is actually into my religion before even meeting me, because then I know their religion is true. I don't want some fake raising my kids. Plus, the whole conversion-for-marriage thing doesn't seem to work. Most shocking example: one girl I knew a while back got married to this Christian American man who converted to Islam to marry her. On their flight to their honeymoon, he drank scotch on the rocks and had a ham sandwich, even with a kosher option available. When she asked him what he was doing, he told her to get used to it that he was "just Muslim by name". Hmmm...?

5. Man must display scruples: Get your mind outta the gutter, I mean scruples (or principles) for real. To marry an Arab girl of good standing, a man must show that he was well-bred with a strong spine and a courageous stance in any situation. I'm not sure of an exact list of ways to show your scruples, but for example, a man with intent to marry a girl, once engaged, may bring her home at an early hour and be sure to let the parents know that it was he who insisted she should be home at a decent hour, or if she comes home alone, be sure to call her and make sure that she got home okay. Or perhaps display some sense of chivalry.

6. Man must speak same language and have same cultural background as woman: Sure, speaking the same language is a given, but for us, since many of us are bilingual, the need for a man who speaks both English and Arabic is almost a necessity. I don't believe that there would be the right harmony in the relationship if there is no meeting of the minds, which also is presented in the socioeconomic and educational points. If the couple does not think the same way, then how can they agree on how to raise their children or how to present themselves to each other and to society? Sure, there are many examples of two people of different cultures coming together and having successful marriages, but where is the guarantee of every trial coming out as such?

This is a pretty concise list of credentials for a husband, and I realize that there is more to it, but this is just a list of main points. Now, even if this list is met and the husband's list for a wife's creds is met, there is still the point of chemistry. Unfortunately, it just seems impossible to get married... but don't fear ladies... I'm adamant (or hopeful) that there will be somewhere out there for each one of you.